outline support for "The View From Nowhere"

If I can so easily dash out bullet points describing what material I want to
cover, converting the bullet points into paragraphs of actual prose shouldn't
be so hard, right? Right?

diff --git a/content/drafts/the-view-from-nowhere.md b/content/drafts/the-view-from-nowhere.md
index d6bdb38..d34dbcd 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/the-view-from-nowhere.md
+++ b/content/drafts/the-view-from-nowhere.md
@@ -17,4 +17,19 @@ Are women and men mostly similar, or mostly different?
 
 what counts as "similar" vs. "different" isn't scientifically interesting: the data speaks for itself; how you want to summarize the data to stupid humans who can't hold multivariate probability distributions in their head is a matter of politics
 
-[make sure to explain how this is different from "Categories Were Made" sophistry]
+OUTLINE OF POINTS TO HIT—
+
+ * most disagreements are fake because people are squabbling over framing and
+   culture and "ought" rather than difference in the same world that we all
+   inhabit
+ * specific example: are trans women women?
+ * specific example: are men and women mostly different, or mostly the same?
+ * framing disputes aren't _completely_ trivially reducible, because some
+   categories are genuinely more natural than others
+ * I'm not "above" normal human discourse—I have my preferences, which I'll
+   fight for despite being idiosyncratic to me, and my views on which
+   categories are natrual which I currently think are transpersonal, but
+   _insofar as I can_, I want this blog to focus on describing the map, seeking
+   the view from nowhere.
+    * It helps to be _explicit_ about when you're being normative, and when you
+      think you're describing the territory.