Bailey's new AGP-in-women study is out

There's a tempURL share link, but no truly ungated version. This makes
me think that I should write my response to Scott as a separate post
after all—the impulse to shove it into the megapost was born of
"wanting to be done"—but we've established that that's not the right
way to think of it.

diff --git a/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md b/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md
index 00be6cf..0dfb22e 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md
+++ b/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md
@@ -124,3 +124,10 @@ A much better analogy is ||the thing where you, Linta, and Swimmer report fantas
 
 S. (she doesn't get it):
 > I do also enjoy fantasizing from the perspective of a fictional very attractive woman and imagining the inner details of a hypothetical other person's attraction to her; this is maybe a form of autogynephilia? (Though it is a bit hard for me to distinguish autogenyphilia from just getting turned on by imagining other people being attracted to you / imagining how other people see you)
+
+
+https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s10508-022-02359-8?sharing_token=jzX6q1NAJAY6-F_jSZ9wmfe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY4WOO91AGBPQEW4W5GA-5HjFFBOW6MbqFHl6iM4xVsaD3DHcIMra_eBV8WQP5ACn0suHGXlnXqqAYAmkbrYzfglseOmxogZQqQ9SymDk_KPLQTlCvTiA2MPLdV_k8lldyE%3D
+
+https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02359-8
+
+https://sillyolme.wordpress.com/2022/06/27/no-women-are-not-autogynephilic/

diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt
index 5672885..220d796 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/post_ideas.txt
+++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 Urgent/needed for healing—
 _ The Two-Type Taxonomy Is a Useful Approximation for ...
 _ I Am Not Great With Secrets (aAL)
+_ Reply to Scott Alexander on Autogenderphilia
 _ Blanchard's Dangerous Idea and the Plight of the Lucid Crossdreamer
 _ A Hill of Validity in Defense of Meaning