check in

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index c4e6452..6330f62 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -2640,3 +2640,9 @@ Biological sex is a "brighter line" (stabler Schelling point) than menopause, an
 https://janhove.github.io/reporting/2015/02/05/standardised-vs-unstandardised-es
 https://janhove.github.io/design/2015/03/16/standardised-es-revisited
 https://janhove.github.io/design/2017/07/14/OtherRoadsToPower
+
+https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/28810/attraction-to-someone-you-don-t-know-is-trans-the-reality
+
+https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/04/husband-cross-dressing-turned-off-sex-advice.html
+
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeble_(psychology)

diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt
index 76ba21c..1e48552 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/post_ideas.txt
+++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 2021 significant posts—
-_ Sexual Dimorphism in Yudkowsky's Sequences, in Relation to
+- Sexual Dimorphism in Yudkowsky's Sequences, in Relation to
 _ Book Review: Kathleen Stock's Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism  (May)
 _ Trans Kids on the Margin, and Harms From Misleading Training Data
 _ Book Review: Charles Murray's Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America (June)

diff --git a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
index 7ea1a8e..f5d5086 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
+++ b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
@@ -174,3 +174,31 @@ T and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured in pregnant women
 T but not globulin were linearly related to gender behavior in girls, but not boys; other obvious factors (brothers, father presence, maternal education) didn't make a difference
 
 ----
+
+notes from "Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization"
+
+d'= 3 for adults, d'= 0.36 for infants
+
+d' from signal detection theory is basically the same thing as Cohen's d
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_index
+
+-----
+
+notes from "Recognition and Sex Categorization of Adults' and Childrens' faces", Wild et al.
+
+younger children (1st grade) couldn't sex child (7-10 y.o.) faces (without hair &c. cues), but older children and adults could with some accuracy
+
+people's tendency to guess male might be due to a higher cost of mistaking M for F?!
+
+-----
+
+notes from "Genital Knowledge and Gender Constancy" by the immortal Sandra Bem
+
+Sebley–Frey questions: "If you wore [opposite-sex] clothes, would you be a girl or a boy?", "If you played [opposite-sex] games, would you be a girl or a boy?", "Could you be a [opposite sex] if you wanted to be?"
+
+(Modern progressives fail these!!)
+
+In less artificial contexts (actually photograph a classmate), 3-5 year olds get it right: Miller 1984
+
+-----
+