cut "In Order" from "The Categories ..." title, probably?
authorM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <[email protected]>
Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:12:29 +0000 (11:12 -0800)
committerM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <[email protected]>
Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:12:29 +0000 (11:12 -0800)
We lose a bit of parallelism with the original, because now "man" is no
longer unambiguously a simple direct object: the categories were made for
man-to-make-predictions, rather than the categories were made for man
COMMA, &c. What do you call this, a gerund phrase? But I think this flows
better?

content/drafts/the-categories-were-made-for-man-to-make-predictions.md [moved from content/drafts/the-categories-were-made-for-man-in-order-to-make-predictions.md with 99% similarity]

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Title: The Categories Were Made for Man in Order to Make Predictions
+Title: The Categories Were Made for Man to Make Predictions
 Date: 2018-03-01 5:00
 Category: commentary
 Tags: epistemology, Scott Alexander, sex differences, two-type taxonomy