subject to
authorM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <[email protected]>
Sat, 25 Mar 2017 18:09:05 +0000 (11:09 -0700)
committerM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <[email protected]>
Sat, 25 Mar 2017 18:09:05 +0000 (11:09 -0700)
content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md

index c192fe1..308dfb7 100644 (file)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Date: 2017-03-24 18:00
 Category: other
 Tags: history, two-type taxonomy
 
-Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is an instance of [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy).
+Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is subject to [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy).
 
 No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller or Magnus Hirchfield.