From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:17:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: really should mention Freund in this sentence X-Git-Url: http://534655.efjtl6rk.asia/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=53da359411b3b0988877af28952aeca94ca84177;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git really should mention Freund in this sentence --- diff --git a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md index 308dfb7..811b8c9 100644 --- a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md +++ b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Tags: history, two-type taxonomy Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is subject to [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy). -No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller or Magnus Hirchfield. +No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller, Magnus Hirchfield, or Blanchard's mentor Kurt Freund. I'm talking about Abu Zakaria Yahya Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī [writing in _the 13th century CE_](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukhannathun&oldid=765195263#Scholarly_analysis):