From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:51:40 +0000 (-0800) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://534655.efjtl6rk.asia/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=60086bc3abbedd9444e949fabfca5d0f9bb64f37;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index ee3163c..6166ba8 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2387,3 +2387,5 @@ B.F. on JKR (https://www.facebook.com/duncan.sabien/posts/3883966591638029?comme > I am very glad that I don't have anyone with opinions similar to hers in my immediate vicinity, because I am pretty sure that if I did, my brain would constantly be running a scared loop in any social interactions with them. [...] I think it's important that people can write essays that are as far outside my personal Overton window as hers is outside it (because sometimes they're correct and I should update, even though I don't believe this is an instance of that) https://www.newsweek.com/we-need-balance-when-it-comes-gender-dysphoric-kids-i-would-know-opinion-1567277 + +https://trickymothernature.substack.com/p/one-long-cum diff --git a/notes/speech.md b/notes/speech.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7461937 --- /dev/null +++ b/notes/speech.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +I want to focus on the speech angle! + +L (Zero)— + +> an extremely generous perspective of who should be banned, considering that Capitol insurrection apologists of many forms are getting banned many places but Tailcalled is still a friend of the blog + +Um. I think you're _deeply_ misunderstanding where Tailcalled is coming from. + + + +Emma— + +> r/GCdebatesQT [...] basically a hate sub dressed up as a debate sub. I can see and basically agree with the attitude of just removing the whole GC movement from the platform as a whole rather than trying to salvage some parts of it. + +So, I'm having trouble reconciling this with [your earlier claim that](/2021/Jan/link-unnatural-categories-are-optimized-for-deception/#isso-93) + +> anti-trans campaigners like to _talk_ about "debate" a lot but don't actually make much room for it. My opinion would be that actually coming in with an attitude of "entering into a debate" would have to entail at bare minimum: [...] willingness to listen with openmindedness to the other side's reasons for believing what they believe, and making equal room for the other side to voice their side of the debate. + +---- + +Dan T.— + +I'm noticing an interesting psychological reaction in myself where I find myself having a negative reaction to your comments while simultaneously emphatically agreeing with their literal content. I think it's a tone thing? + +Yes, + + +https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1357616731523608576 + +> Have just seen truly cold, bitter, shaming thread about trans men from followers of mine. I've soft blocked everyone I could on it, and if that's you, I urge you not to refollow me again—our politics are not the same. + +https://time.com/collection/100-most-influential-people-2020/5888158/chase-strangio/ +https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1357323996547723264