From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 00:31:27 +0000 (-0700) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://534655.efjtl6rk.asia/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=64651d737385cec884f0f48e4442f4b87aa6d19e;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md b/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md index a576f6a..00be6cf 100644 --- a/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md +++ b/content/drafts/reply-to-scott-alexander-on-autogenderphilia.md @@ -115,3 +115,12 @@ But it's not. On this website, [Rafael Harth explains why 50% isn't special](htt I don't particularly fault Scott for this: [by his own admission, he's not a math guy](https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/01/31/the-parable-of-the-talents/). (And the vast majority of math people can't write as well or as fast as Scott. No one is the best at everything!) Rather, I'm saying that a culture that wants to _actually_ be right about everything would do better to _just_ focus on being right on the object level, without [wireheading on its own promises of being right about everything](http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/effective-altruism-is-self-recommending/). (Incidentally, Scott himself is actually very good about [not trying to claim more authority than is actually justified by his performance](https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/07/04/some-clarifications-on-rationalist-blogging/). His fans should try to be more like him along this dimension!) + +I doubt that's the same phenomenon? The thing about reports like, _e.g._, ||I have a female body in all my sexual fantasies (as reported by Anomaly above)|| is that there's an obvious explanation for that ||if you're _actually female_—namely, that your fantasy life is based on real life along this dimension—and that explanation is not present for people who are _not_ female||? + +||I think the way to think about this question is to imagine that if you'd _never heard_ of this stupid ideologically-charged debate—would you need to _spontaneously invent_ the term AGP (or a synonym like _eonism_ as coined by Ellis in 1920 ) _in order to make sense of your experience_? If your _serious_ answer is Yes, that's _really interesting_ and I want to hear more. (Omega seems to be claiming this about herself, which is _really_ fascinating and my model _definitely_ loses some points for predicting that she shouldn't exist.) But I think _most_ females saying "yeah, sure, cis women are AGP too; it's, like, getting turned on by imagining other people being attracted to you, right? Seems normal" _after having been presented with the term in an ideologically-charged context_ are not really understanding the phenomenon in males that the term was originally coined to point to.|| + +A much better analogy is ||the thing where you, Linta, and Swimmer report fantasizing about being male sometimes. This is plausibly auto-_andro_-philia, and like AGP, it's actually _pretty common_—_e.g._, Person _et al._ 1989 Table 3 () found 10 percent of female and 13 percent of male college students reporting yes to "Fantasizing that you are of opposite sex".|| + +S. (she doesn't get it): +> I do also enjoy fantasizing from the perspective of a fictional very attractive woman and imagining the inner details of a hypothetical other person's attraction to her; this is maybe a form of autogynephilia? (Though it is a bit hard for me to distinguish autogenyphilia from just getting turned on by imagining other people being attracted to you / imagining how other people see you) diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index 626af22..5c18969 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ Thellim's horror at the fictional world of Jane Austen is basically how I feel a The problem is _not_ that I think there's anything wrong with having cross-sex fantasies, and wanting the fantasy to be real—just as Thellim's problem with _Pride and Prejudice_ is not there being anything wrong with wanting to marry a suitable bachelor. These are perfectly respectable goals. -The _problem_ is that people who are trying to be people, people who are trying to acheive their goals _in reality_, do so in a way involves having concepts of their own minds, and trying to improve both their self-models and their selves, and that's _not possible_ in a culture that tries to ban, as heresy, the idea that it's possible for someone's self-model to be wrong. +The _problem_ is that people who are trying to be people, people who are trying to acheive their goals _in reality_, do so in a way involves having concepts of their own minds, and trying to improve both their self-models and their selves—and that's _not possible_ in a culture that tries to ban, as heresy, the idea that it's possible for someone's self-model to be wrong. A trans woman I follow on Twitter complained that a receptionist at her workplace said she looked like a male celebrity. "I'm so mad," she fumed. "I look like this right now"—there was a photo attached to the Tweet—"how could anyone ever think that was an okay thing to say?" @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ But I would have expected people with the barest inkling of self-awareness and h And if that's too much to accept of the general public— -And it's too much to expect of garden-variety "rationalists" to figure out on their own— +And it's too much to expect of garden-variety "rationalists" to figure out on their own without prompting from their betters— Then I would have at least hoped Eliezer Yudkowsky to be _in favor of_ rather than _against_ his faithful students having these very basic capabilities for reflection, self-observation, and ... _speech_? @@ -918,4 +918,43 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/criticisms-of-the-rationalist-movement https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7MCqRnZzvszsxgtJi/christiano-cotra-and-yudkowsky-on-ai-progress?commentId=iKEuFQg7HZatoebps > and yeah, when Joanna came out on Facebook Zack messaged her to have a 3-hour debate about it -> I think no matter how pure his pursuit of knowledge this is actually bad behavior and he should not \ No newline at end of file +> I think no matter how pure his pursuit of knowledge this is actually bad behavior and he should not + +Standard excuses— +"i just don't think that gender is less of a politeness mind-control regime when it doesn't allow people to switch categories" +biosex actually exists +also no one cares about that fact of the matter, unless they want to have sex with someone or are doing a weird ideological thing +I think you're the ones doing a weird ideological thing + +brain: wow, eiko has a deep understanding of straight men for a lesbian! she must be so empathetic +me: ... + +... why validated and not offended?? +Eiko — Today at 8:37 PM +?_? +what... would i be... offended by... +Carrie Zelda-Michelle Davis — Today at 8:38 PM +The "brain: / me:" thing seems like it should be offensive for the same reason that the phrase-I-said-I-wasn't-going-to-say is offensive +the language is subtler, but it's gesturing at the same thing + +(explanation: I read this as ozy saying they parsed Eiko as a girl so much that they didn't remember she used to be a straight guy) + +... I, just, really have trouble emphasizing with this culture where people are allowed to make jokes about the similarities between trans lesbians and straight guys, and as long as you talk in terms of "I thought I was a straight guy", it's all cool, but as soon as someone bites the bullet and says, "Yes, because trans lesbians are straight males, etiologically; you thought correctly", then they're ... marking themselves as not part of the coalition? From my perspective, it just looks like your culture is pro-lying + +like if i look at a person and my brain's intuitive instinctive bucketing function goes "girl" and they tell me "i'm a boy actually" does whether that's mind control depend on what genitals the person has?? +Carrie Zelda-Michelle Davis — Today at 10:02 PM +Yes? +Omega ω — Today at 10:02 PM +????? + +... people just don't see the ideological bubble they live in! People tell me, "frankly you seem to be deeply unhappy about [being gendered male]", because they're relying on their prior of what trans women need. And having been born in 1987, I just don't share that prior! If you actually listen to the thing I'm been yelling for the last six years, I'm much more unhappy about the culture of mind-control than I am about being male, but people put more weight on their prior than my verbal self-report! I guess I can't blame them on the meta level (I also put more weight on priors that people's self-reports a lot of the time), but it's just—so shocking, that people don't see the thing + +I don't actually want to return to the past permanently; I want to first rewind to 2007 or so, and then re-do the trans rights thing but with less 🐛 lying this time, "lying" being my heat-of-the-moment angry word for the thing where the born-in-the-wrong-body story that gets sold to the public is very different from the picture you get when you read what people write about their feelings when the general public isn't looking, and people know it's different, and they go on talking in terms of the standard story anyway, and when you challenge them on none of this stuff being true, they say, "Oh, well, those are just lies to cis people; that doesn't count" (https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/lies-to-cis-people/) as if lies to cis people weren't still lies + +And, just—I think if an alien or an AI or really any normal person outside of this very specific Berkeley 2016– ideological subculture were to try to objectively describe what's actually happening there in the real physical universe, I don't think they would want to talk about a woman born in the wrong body, coping with her tragic dysphoria; I think the alien or AI would talk about a male primate with some kind of brain malfunction in its sexual targeting system causing it to get confused about a self-other distinction, and I think the normal person would talk about a man with a gross, weird fetish who they don't want sharing a locker room with their daughter. + +And I just, basically think the alien and the AI and the normal person have the right ontology here? The Berkeley 2016– denizen can come up with a lot of replies ("But cis women also enjoy being women", "But I don't care about someone's private thoughts; I only care about whether they'll come vintage dress shopping with me"), but they all just seem fundamentally unserious to me? + +---- + +Habryka's PalmCone memo mentions there being people whose top priority is to influence you—that's totally what I was doing to Scott and Eliezer diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index 95a88a1..fd988e3 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -3125,3 +3125,5 @@ GPT just finished a completion with `_Crossposted to [crossdreamers.com](https:/ When another transfem saw two women being close, intimate friends, they “immediately wanted to be one of the two”, and after they learned about lesbianism they would get envious too (Hirschfeld, p.71). https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/utgb1d/how_to_deal_with_extreme_jealousy_towards_cis/ + +https://pitt.substack.com/p/30k-a-year-and-my-kid-cant-tell-the diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index c6f214f..d96fb1f 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ LW— _ reply to David Silver on AI motivations: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/SbAgRYo8tkHwhd9Qx/deepmind-the-podcast-excerpts-on-agi#David_Silver_on_it_being_okay_to_have_AGIs_with_different_goals_____ _ Charles Goodhart Elementary School (story about Reflection Sentences, and the afterschool grader being wrong _ Steering Towards Agreement Is Like Discouraging Betting -_ (not really for LW) mediation with Duncan +_ (not really for LW) mediation with Duncan: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/SWxnP5LZeJzuT3ccd/?commentId=KMoFiGMzxWkWJLWcN _ Conflict Theory of Bounded Distrust: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/bounded-distrust _ Generic Consequentialists Are Liars _ Comment on "The Logic of Indirect Speech" (multi-receivers vs. uncertainty about a single recieiver)