From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 00:12:39 +0000 (-0700) Subject: check in before a solid three-day sprint!! X-Git-Url: http://534655.efjtl6rk.asia/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a411c533d779ad79bc35700a7f017e63e4f282d3;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in before a solid three-day sprint!! I pulled out my network cable yesterday, but let myself get distracted with phone and laptop. (I am proud of some zinger commentary I got off in the Eliezerfic server.) I have plans to see Father on Sunday evening. I want to get some solid momentum tonight, and treat tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday-before-17 as serious heads-down workdays. The phone should go off after I watch teevee tonight (there's a new Lower Decks, and I'm enjoying the Hansonian black comedy Avenue 5); it's too dangerous. --- diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md index 71a62e6..66bc3f2 100644 --- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md +++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md @@ -541,7 +541,11 @@ It seemed that the Category War was over, and we lost. We _lost?!_ How could we _lose?!_ The philosophy here was _very clear-cut_. This _shouldn't_ be hard or expensive or difficult to clear up. I could believe that Alexander was "honestly" confused, but Yudkowsky ...!? -I could see how, under ordinary circumstances, asking Yudkowsky to weigh in on my post would seem inappropriately demanding of a Very Important Person's time, given that a simple person such as me was surely as a mere _worm_ in the presence of the great Eliezer Yudkowsky. But the only reason for my post to exist was because it would be even _more_ inappropriately demanding to ask for a clarification in the original gender-political context. I _don't_ think it was inappropriately demanding to expect "us" (him) to _be correct about the cognitive function of categorization_. (If not, why pretend to have a "rationality community" at all?) I was trying to be as accomodating as possible, given that decideratum. +I could see how, under ordinary circumstances, asking Yudkowsky to weigh in on my post would be inappropriately demanding of a Very Important Person's time, given that a simple person such as me was surely as a mere _worm_ in the presence of the great Eliezer Yudkowsky. + +(That's why the social proof from Michael + Ben + Sarah + Jessica + secret-posse-member was so essential.) + +But the only reason for my post to exist was because it would be even _more_ inappropriately demanding to ask for a clarification in the original gender-political context. I _don't_ think it was inappropriately demanding to expect "us" (him) to _be correct about the cognitive function of categorization_. (If not, why pretend to have a "rationality community" at all?) I was trying to be as accomodating as possible, given that decideratum. Jessica mentioned talking with someone about me writing to Yudkowsky and Alexander requesting that they clarify the category boundary thing. This person described having a sense that I should have known that wouldn't work—because of the politics involved, not because I wasn't right. I thought Jessica's takeaway was very poignant: diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index 09106e5..bda48db 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -1217,3 +1217,8 @@ An analogy: racist jokes are also just jokes. Alice says, "What's the difference Similarly, the "Caliphate" humor only makes sense in the first place in the context of a celebrity culture where deferring to Scott and Eliezer is expected behavior. (In a way that deferring to Julia Galef or John S. Wentworth is not expected behavior, even if Galef and Wentworth also have a track record as good thinkers.) I think this culture is bad. _Nullius in verba_. [TODO: asking Anna to weigh in] (I figured that spamming people with hysterical and somewhat demanding physical postcards was more polite (and funnier) than my recent habit of spamming people with hysterical and somewhat demanding emails.) + +https://trevorklee.substack.com/p/the-ftx-future-fund-needs-to-slow +> changing EA to being a social movement from being one where you expect to give money + +when I talked to the Kaiser psychiatrist in January 2021, he said that the drugs that they gave me in 2017 were Zyprexa 5mg and Trazadone 50mg, which actually seems a lot more reasonable in retrospect (Trazadone is on Scott's insomnia list), but it was a lot scarier in the context of not trusting the authorities