From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 20:16:02 +0000 (-0700) Subject: memoir: the model clicked X-Git-Url: http://534655.efjtl6rk.asia/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c07cdf90be9fb5972ce5f1af3edffb12854565d1;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git memoir: the model clicked A lot of the post is good enough to reproduce almost-verbatim, but I don't want to go full verbatim and put it in a blockquote, because I don't like the ALLCAPS yelling, and I never explained the "causality goes the other way" slogan. (I think I meant, politics mostly creates LGBTQ+ identities rather than LGBTQ+ people uniting to protect theirrights.) Should I be explaining that here? --- diff --git a/content/drafts/blanchards-dangerous-idea-and-the-plight-of-the-lucid-crossdreamer.md b/content/drafts/blanchards-dangerous-idea-and-the-plight-of-the-lucid-crossdreamer.md index 11e5f76..af9393d 100644 --- a/content/drafts/blanchards-dangerous-idea-and-the-plight-of-the-lucid-crossdreamer.md +++ b/content/drafts/blanchards-dangerous-idea-and-the-plight-of-the-lucid-crossdreamer.md @@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ I replied, but was circular, right?—that women are people who are happier bein ------- +In another post from 4:25 _p.m._ that afternoon, I acknowledged my right-wing influences. You know, you spend nine years reading a lot of ideologically-inconvenient science, all the while thinking, "Oh, this is just interesting science, you know, I'm not going to let myself get _morally corrupted_ by it or anything." And for the last couple years you add in some ideologically-inconvenient political thinkers, too. + +But I was still a nice good socially-liberal Free-to-Be-You-and-Me gender-egalitarian individualist person. Because I understood the is–ought distinction—unlike _some_ people—I knew that I could learn from people's _models_ of the world without necessarily agreeing with their _goals_. So I had been trying to learn from the models of these bad people saying the bad things, until one day _the model clicked_. And the model was _terrifying_. And the model had _decision-relevant implications for the people who valued the things that I valued_— + +The thing was, I actually _didn't_ think I had been morally corrupted after all! I thought I was actually _really good_ at maintaining the is–ought distinction in my mind. But more people who hadn't followed by exact intellectual trajectory, the mere fact that I was saying, "Wait! Stop! The things that you're doing may not in fact be the optimal things!" made it _look_ like I'd been morally corrupted, and there was no easy way for me to prove otherwise. + +So, people probably shouldn't believe me. This was just a little manic episode with no serious implications. Right? + +------- + Somewhat awkwardly, I actually had a date scheduled with "Noreen" that evening. The way that happened was, elsewhere on Facebook, earlier, on 7 February, Brent Dill had said that he didn't see the value in the community matchmaking site _reciprocity.io_, and I disagreed, saying that the hang-out matching had been valuable to me, even if the romantic matching was useless for insufficiently high-status males. "Noreen" had complained: "again with pretending only guys can ever have difficulties getting dates (sorry for this reaction, I just find this incredibly annoying)". I had said that she shouldn't apologize; I usually didn't make that genre of comment, but it seemed thematic while replying to Brent. Incidentally, I added, I was thinking of seeing seeing that new _Hidden Figures_ movie if I could find someone to go with? It turned out that she had already seen it, but we made plans to see _West Side Story_ at the [Castro Theatre](https://www.castrotheatre.com/) instead. diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index ad1f2af..05604d8 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ marked TODO _ fully off the rails 15–17 February [pt. 2] ✓ a moment of liberating clarity [pt. 2] +✓ "model clicked" [pt. 2] - NRx education with "Wilhelm" [pt. 2] -_ "model clicked" [pt. 2] + ✓ Eliezerfic fight: Big Yud tests me [pt. 6] - Eliezerfic fight: grading rubric [pt. 6] @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ _ emailing Blanchard/Bailey/Hsu/Lawrence [pt. 2] it was actually "wander onto the AGI mailing list wanting to build a really big semantic net" (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9HGR5qatMGoz4GhKj/above-average-ai-scientists) With internet available— +_ Free to Be You and Me _ Thing of Things _ when was Ozy "On AGP" published? _ Yudkowsky Tweet about identifying as a decision theorist